The Debate of the Existence of God

Abstract\nThis paper explores the parentage between a prof whos an atheistic and his scholar whos a Christian. An condition was affix by Patricia Bridewell on her website (www.patrish.com) sent to her by Phil Mathews. Phil Mathews was not the write of the said article. there will be collar premises provided supporting the shutting of the Christian pupil. The author beca make use of concluded that the bank line is inductive leading to some of the fallacies found. The author found 4 (four) tenacious fallacies present on twain side of the argument: (1) steady Questions, (2) Appeal to Authority, (3) Appeal to Ignorance, (4) Ad Hominem-Abusive. This paper then, gave out reasons, chiefly according to the article, that faith on something that one coffin nailnot be be by acquirement is a way to believe that something very does exist. The author, then, gave out reasons why the argument of both sides are weak.\n\nKeywords: ad hominem, inductive, atheist\n\nDoes theology genuinely Exist?\nIn the article, The doubter: Professor vs the Christian Student, posted on Patricia Bridewells blogspot www.patrish.com), wherein an Atheist prof and a Christian student argue whether or not god does exist, there came 3 (three) premises: (Premise 1): The Christian student claimed that the professor is work on the premise of duality. The professor sees God as something he can measure through giving out duality; a good God and a risky God. When, science cant even off fully understand the things they use to measure things. (Premise 2): The Christian student claimed that God, according to the Bible, is letting bad things happen, to tell if people can choose good or evil by their deliver free will. (Premise 3): Finally, the student claimed that if God is non-existent according to the quintet senses, then, the professors brain, in which the five senses cannot prove exists, is non-existent as well. The conclusion would be, according to the argument do by the professor and the Christian s...