'African Resistance to Colonial Rule Essay\r'

'Industrialization stirred ambition in many atomic number 63an nations they wanted to a greater extent re semens to fuel their industrial production. They compete for impudent market for their goods .they looked to Africa as a source of the raw material and as substanti eithery as market for their goods.\r\n tho European had earlier establish contact with Africa as early as the 1450s, they actually controlled rattling little land. Powerful African armies were qualified to keep the European out of about of Africa for four centuries.it was gathered that the original venturer of Africa were the Portuguese in the 15th century, at that time the gap in the midst of the European and the African in term of ontogeny was not much. Thus four centuries had mark a significant change in term of development in Europe which Africa cannot match. That prompts the European business sector of Africa.\r\nThe berlin collection which took propose between the 15th November ,1884 and 26th Novemb er,1885,the berlin atomic number 74 African conference, to prevent fighting 14 European nation met at the berlin conference to laydown eclipses for the division of Africa. The essence of the conference as it were was to laydown rules of the game, the do and don’ts of European occupation interest in Africa which were later nontextual mattericulated.\r\n withal in achieving total occupation of Africa the Europeans apply diplomacy or military trespass or two in achieving their aim. each nooks and cranny of Africa followed in most cases by military onslaughts, conquest, and occupation by armies of varying sizes and discipline. The period from 1800-1900 marked the highest level of European conquest and occupation of Africa. During these time all African had same objective that is support their soereignty and traditional way of life, it is the strategies that varies. leash options were opened to African, that of con dependation, that of alliance and that of acquiescence (accept without protest) or submission. The strategy of pg. 1 confrontation convoluted open warfare, sieges, and guerrilla tactics, scorched humanity policies as well as diplomacy.\r\nHowever various rulers choose method that worthy them their understanding, the likes of the Asante’s who choose confrontation as a stretch forthance against the European after(prenominal) many years of vindication vanish in 1896 when the British force raided the because Asantehene Agyeman Prempeh 1 of the Asante empire capturing him a colossal with his unwavering chiefs and as well as his flummox ,who were sent on exile first to sierra Leon and later to Seychelles .An opposite prominent African ruler who successfully resist European rule was Emperor Menenelik 11 of Ethiopia utilise what I described as alliance and pretence, through these he gain the bank of the Italian, reached an agreement them to sign the accord of Occiat. invoice has it that there were two version of the treat y unrivaled in Italian and the other one in Amharic; both treaties were different in content. Emperor Menenelik 11 of Ethiopia was wise to countenance subscribe the in his language. After the signing of the treaty Italian declared themselves as the representative of Ethiopian on foreign affairs, Emperor Menenelik 11 of Ethiopia knowing exactly what he signed sent a circular garner to Italy and the European cause stating his case.\r\nBefore Italian could realized they have been cheated it’s already too late. They invaded Ethiopia in 1986 only to have lost to a tactically and wellarmed army powered by the Italian themselves. This confound of these defeat contain to Italian invasion of Ethiopia by Benito Mussolini’s in1936. Elsewhere, when the French attacked Ouagadougou the deposed Mogbo of Naba, Wobogo do sacrifice to the earth shrine, tradition has it that he sacrificed a dreary cock, a black donkey and a black striver on a large hummock near the Volta river beseeching the earth goddess to pack the French away and to destroy the betrayer Mazi who they had placed on the throne.\r\nIn the backwash of the European conquest, Africa resisted European occupation of Africa from the Asante, the Ethiopians and the Mossi of Ouagadougou each ruler choose different accession to resistance. In which that of Menelik11 was the most successful.it could be illustrious that lack of common front lead to the fruitless, unrewarding causa against the European conquest. Thurs the bulky Egyptian empire as they were, the Asante empire,the Somoury Toure of Senegambia, the Ethiopian and the Zulu empire could have fought together to resist the European on common front of which would pg. 2 have been successful. In ill will of this the various African communities were facing commodious tussle for empire from their neighbours even when one calls for help the other saw that as a pisseds to acquire more empire.\r\nHowever territorial conflict triggered the i neffectualness of the resistance, the British apply the conflict between the Fante and the Asante to declare Asante a savage land, thereby acquiring both at the long run\r\nHowever it could be observe that African lacks courage and military acquirement compared to their European counterpart. African is at heartrending disadvantages in the face of the invaders. During the scramble for African the European had advanced military power compared to that of Africa, Africa could not defend against the canon and the adage gun when African were still employ old ways of combat that call for bow, arrow, spear and machete.\r\nMoreover the European used vast experience they acquired from their long biography of colonial rule and exploitation nearly the world in point by 1885weatern European had already mastered the art of divide, conquer and rule having skilled over four centuries of imperialism and exploitation in America, Asia and the pacific.\r\n nevertheless African resistance not be said to be fruitless effort but a partly win battle which at an enormous point of experience. The resistance gave birth to nationalism, in fact by 1935 when the Italian conquered Ethiopia under the rule of Benito Mussolini, Africans were fall in on the need to writhe back Ethiopia from the Italian by mean kernel of radical nationalist travail in Africa. Other African countries had looked upon Ethiopia as a source of hope. Its long story and culture were impressive. Its independent was used to elevate the ability of African to conduct their affair. African nationalist and pan Africanist everywhere were united in their condemnation of colonial and their disassemble to seek all possible means to end it. I will answer ‘A lesson well learnt’ the African resistance to colonial rule.\r\nREFERENCE:\r\n1. oxford advanced learners dictionary 7th edition\r\n2. Age of African imperialism, imperialist divides Africa pg 685 pdf\r\n'