Bush Imposes Gag Rule :: Argumentative Persuasive Topics

render Imposes Gag Rule   On January 25, 2001, on his first trading day in office (and the 28th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the turning point U.S. Supreme Court decision establishing a womans right to an abortion), President George W. furnish stupidly re-imposed the Global Gag Rule on the U.S. Agency for international Development (USAID) population program. This policy restricts foreign non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that receive USAID family planning monetary resource from using their consume, non-U.S. funds to provide legal abortion operate, lobby their consume governments for abortion law square away, or even provide accurate health check counseling or referrals regarding abortion. See what damage he is doing The 1973 Helms Amendment is a legislative provision that already restricts U.S. funds from being used for these activities, but Bush had to get involved for political purposes.   About 2 million women analyze every year from unsafe abortions, a sta tistic that could be virtually eliminated by the provision of appropriate health information and services and law reform efforts. Despite this, President Bushs Executive Memorandum directs USAID to reinstate in bounteous all of the requirements of the Mexico City Policy in effect on January 19, 1993. correspond to this policy, foreign organizations-- a lot the only health care providers in remote, rural areas--are taboo from using their own, non-U.S. funds for * providing legal abortions even, can you believe, where a womans physical or mental health is endangered (the only exceptions are in cases of rape, incest, or where the womans life is endangered) * providing advice and information regarding the availability and benefits of abortion and from providing referrals to another health clinic * lobbying their own governments to legalize abortion, to maintain current law and oppose restrictions, or to decriminalize abortion and * conducting public education campaigns regarding abortion.   In addition, even the provision of services that are permitted1 on paper, such as life-saving abortions and post-abortion care, are often curtailed because NGOs fear jeopardizing their funding through any association with abortion - what cowardliness Providers may even be reluctant to dispense emergency contraception--which acts to hamper pregnancy and is not an abortifacient (despite the lies you may hear from the antichoice groups and the Catholic perform --because of the Global Gag Rule.