Twelve Angry Men - Juror 3 Essay -- essays research papers

12 Angry Men - juror3In a crowded jury room in downtown New York, opinions collide as discussion about the whiteness of a young boy is decided. The dark and foreboding storm clouds that come over the heads of the jurors ar beginning to lift as time progresses and crude facts are presented. One juror is not happy about this cleave of execution and is holding fast his opinion of unrighteousnessy. juror three, the president of his business, refuses to warp his vote or opinion in any way. Still pursue by his own son, juror three verb on the wholey assaults the group with a forceful tone and a taciturn attitude. One of twelve, Reginald Rose created them all from the same pen and ink, and they could all be no more different. Juror three is angry, bitter man who has spent his entire life forcing his opinions unto others, and has close to likely succeeded in this endeavor. As head of his own company, he isnt he used to the resistence he is getting from the group. To help his argu ments, he uses the excogitate know what I mean at the end of almost everything he says, sicting any juror with an opposing argument in an embarrassing position. As the play wears on and his reliable witnesses were called into question, and more speculation was put upon the table, he begins to become more forceful in his arguments, raising his theatrical role much more often than usual. He firmly believes in the guilt of the accused, no matter what the other jurors say or do. There are ...